Home › GPUs & Macs › NVIDIA RTX 5090 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q

NVIDIA RTX 5090 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q for local LLMs

Across 4 tests measured on both, the NVIDIA RTX 5090 is faster in 4 and generates a median 1.28× the tokens/s of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q.

On gpt-oss 20B (MXFP4, llama-bench) the NVIDIA RTX 5090 generates 283 tokens/s and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q 250 tokens/s (measured).

Same model, same quant, same test

ModelQuant / testRTX 5090
tok/s
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q
tok/s
FasterSources and run details
gpt-oss 20BMXFP4
llama-bench
283
CUDA
250
CUDA
RTX 5090 +13%llama.cpp #15396 RTX 5090 · llama.cpp #15396 RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q
Llama 3.1 8B InstructQ4_K_M
LocalScore
66.3
llamafile
46.2
llamafile
RTX 5090 +44%LocalScore RTX 5090 · LocalScore RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q
Llama 3.2 1B InstructQ4_K_M
LocalScore
120
llamafile
106
llamafile
RTX 5090 +13%LocalScore RTX 5090 · LocalScore RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q
Qwen2.5 14B InstructQ4_K_M
LocalScore
41.8
llamafile
23.7
llamafile
RTX 5090 +76%LocalScore RTX 5090 · LocalScore RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q

Generation speed in tokens/s, best measured backend for each chip (shown under the number). Backends can differ between the two chips; check them before drawing conclusions. Measured results only, nothing estimated.

Specs

NVIDIA RTX 5090NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q
Memory32 GB96 GB
Memory bandwidth1792 GB/s1792 GB/s

All results for the NVIDIA RTX 5090 · All results for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q · More comparisons